> Again, bind is there to BIND to a callable thing (function or functor).

> Why you would want to try to LOGICAL AND the result, is beyond me.

It's not logically anding the binds right there on the spot.  Each bind results in a boost::function, and &&'ing to of those results in another boost::function.  It actually builds an expression which later calls both, then ands.  Can I ask, are you one of the boost::bind maintainers?  I'm guessing it may be best to simply file a bug report.  The test case is clearly succinct.

Jason