On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Tom Kent <lists@teeks99.com> wrote:


On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
The first beta packages for 1.62.0 beta 1 are now available:


The SHA256 checksums are as follows:

    f7cc83e6a3b03cd7aa8822992aa3e36422cc2214644d69277ef55a4db51f44bd  boost_1_62_0_b1.7z
    4057993811e40b1fd4719675e44c2550b6c2379546192da2299c17fec9a3dddf  boost_1_62_0_b1.tar.bz2
    fb0c10b625c5ec47cc837b54740540e400c59571b2eabf427c00f32bffc6ca70  boost_1_62_0_b1.tar.gz
    b38ef21c43c5ff814a2144bc23871c134164e7f51c71672d0f49a44636fb50b5  boost_1_62_0_b1.zip

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download
the archive of your choice and give building it a try. Please report
both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

Thanks!

-- The release managers

Just to clarify, is the process going forward going to be to not have RCs for betas? How about final releases?

I don't think it makes sense to make RCs for a beta. If there's something wrong we just make another beta. But we'll have them for release since it's not easy to redo those.

(Or did I miss the message with the RC?)

Didn't miss it.

--
-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail