Em 28 jun 2017, às 0:31, Chris Glover <c.d.glover@gmail.com> escreveu:[...]Was any more consideration given to using Boost.TypeIndex so that the library will work on compilers with rtti disabled? Or was that dismissed? I can't find where that thought ended up amongst all of the discussion. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/doc/html/poly_collection/future_work.html#poly_collection.future_work.alternative_rtti_systems
[...]
Was any more consideration given to using Boost.TypeIndex so that the library will work on compilers with rtti disabled? Or was that dismissed? I can't find where that thought ended up amongst all of the discussion.