Jeanette/Micheal,

thanks.  But as I stated in the original email, the versions of boost are beyond my control.

Jamie

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:57 AM Michael Powell via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:49 AM Jeanette C. via Boost-users
<boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
>
> Hey hey Jamie,
> Apr 30 2019, Jamie Jason via Boost-users has written:
> ...
> > The project I am working on uses Boost 1.63 statically linked and a
> > third-party shared library that  uses Boost 1.66 statically linked on
> > CentOS 7.

Is the 3P open source? On github, or other Git (or other) repository?
Fork it and built it yourself on 1.63/1.66 (whichever is appropriate)
for your environment.

> ...
> Are there (many) good reasons why you can't port your own application to
> use Boost 1.69? Even if you need static linkage, Boost 1.69 must be
> installed on your system and on the system running your software,
> because of the third-party requirement. Sorry, maybe this is a naive
> approach.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Jeanette
>
> --
>   * Website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer is a state of sound
>   * SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/jeanette_c
>   * Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMS4rfGrTwz8W7jhC1Jnv7g
>   * GitHub: https://github.com/jeanette-c
>   * Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeanette_c_s
>
> When you need someone, you just turn around and I will be there <3
> (Britney Spears)
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users@lists.boost.org
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users