On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:18 AM Richard Hodges via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
It looks very interesting. The idea of not using macros is very appealing to me.

Indeed. What surprised me, given the announcement on the Boost ML, was the lack
of comparison to Boost's own Boost.Test library (and its other single-header lightweight one,
which AFAIK is not an official library, please correct me if I'm wrong). --DD