Le 08/10/2019 à 18:52, Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users a écrit :
>> 1. This essentially means library maintainers are choosing to maintain
>> at least 2 build systems (bjam for overall boost build, + whatever
>> preferential build system they use for the library itself).
>
> It is not as difficult or time consuming as one may think.
No offense but who on earth except Boost really use bjam by choice?
For me, Boost Build is more scalable, better designed, encouraging a saner workflow and file organization, more ambitious, and easier to understand than other build systems I have used.
I personally think there is much to learn from working with it.
I hope one day we can make it work a little faster and allow users to override dependence-or-independence of specific targets on specific features/properties.
But still, I love Boost Build.