Hi,

Andrew Hundt wrote:

I proposed to support UDLs because this is the feature from the C++ and we should be up-to-date :).

I would be wary of jumping to support new features just because they are there unless the new solution is undeniably better than existing backward compatible techniques. :-)

If it was possible to parse them in compile-time then it would be better ;)

In my opinion there isn't such a gap so initializer lists make more sense to me.


I agree.

Regards,
Adam