Andrew Hundt wrote:Putting the matrix and the alphabetical index in the "Reference" section probably isn't a good idea, but I'm guessing that indeed the ToC could be more readable if the "Indexes" section (which btw can be confused with "Spatial indexes") was removed. On the top-level we could then have:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Barend Gehrels <barend@xs4all.nl> wrote:Do you mean this:http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_57_0/libs/geometry/doc/html/geometry/indexes/matrix.html
Regards, Barend
aha! yes, apparently I didn't notice that, thanks. In Boost.asio that is directly under "Reference". Maybe that way is easier to find since that index is simply under "Reference" and geometry could be switched? Alternately perhaps a link to the tabular reference could be under the plain "Reference" page?
...
Reference
Access Functions
Adapted models
...
Reference matrix
Reference index
...
would that be ok?
Regards,
Adam
_______________________________________________
Geometry mailing list
Geometry@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry