Hi, Barend!

Is there a chance that those issues with performing boolean operations on polygons with shared edges will be fixed in 1.63?

Thanks!

Best regards, Oleg.

2016-04-21 14:38 GMT+03:00 Oleg Evseev <ev.mipt@gmail.com>:

Hi, Barend

Glad to hear that! I'll be waiting for changes.
Thank you very much for all your efforts in creating excelent library

Best regards, Oleg

2016-04-20 18:26 GMT+03:00 Barend Gehrels <barend@xs4all.nl>:

Hi Oleg,

Op 14-4-2016 om 0:54 schreef Oleg Evseev:

Hi, Barend!

I've tried to use boost 1.61.0 beta for my case. And instead of getting problems with zero areas, I'm getting really wrong result - union ignore one of the mpolygons (without exceptions). I created ticket with WKT https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12125

Illustration: https://s16.postimg.org/9wcp31ik5/union+1.61.0+bug.png
appended mpolygon (the red one - two trinangles) is ignored. union result is equal to current path (the yellow one - two trinangles)

Maybe this is caused by the shared point of two trinangels in one multipolygon?

Thanks for the reports. It is indeed not solved yet. I updated the tickets. It is caused somehow by the precision and need some further study. We plan to change the details of the implementation w.r.t. precision/rescaling for one of the coming versions. Hopefully asap of course, but these things take a longer time.

Regards, Barend

_______________________________________________
Geometry mailing list
Geometry@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/geometry