Subject: Re: [proto] So I heard proto make AST ...
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-27 09:17:41
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 15:04:30 Alp Mestanogullari wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, joel falcou <joel.falcou_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Do people think such stuff (maybe in proto::tree:: or smthg ?) be useful
> > additions ?
> Definitely. We're dealing with a compile-time AST, but this is still
> an AST and we often have to apply transformations to ASTs. Thus,
> having higher order metafunctions in Proto just asking us for the
> transform to apply on each node or somesuch, would be useful
Especially when thinking about phoenix3. People might find it easier to think
of tree traversals instead of proto transforms, grammars and such.
It is at least the case for me.
Proto list run by eric at boostpro.com