Sorry it took me so long to get back with everyone, I am getting married so I have been a little busy.&nbsp; The following functions are causing compile errors in STDCALL.<br><br>on_thread_exit<br>on_tls_prepare<br>on_process_init<br>on_process_term<br><br>Also, what rewrite work is going on with the thread library?<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Jeff Idol<br><br><b><i>Anthony Williams &lt;anthony@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk&gt;</i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> Jeff Idol <jeffidolh@yahoo.com> writes:<br><br>&gt; I recently changed my boost install to build everything in STDCALL by<br>&gt; changing the compile flags.  This worked well for all of the other libraries<br>&gt; except for python and thread.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I did some quick checking, and it appears that there are some windows<br>&gt; specific C functions in thread that are required to be compiled CDECL<br>&gt; because of windows
 thread function syntax.  While most of the functions have<br>&gt; been correctly prototyped and defined, there seem to be several that are<br>&gt; still not setup properly.  I have been able to compile them by just<br>&gt; explicitly putting the proper CDECL statements in the functions.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; So my question really is, has anyone else noticed this issue, and are there<br>&gt; any plans to fix it?<br><br>I haven't noticed, but I don't tend to change the default calling<br>convention. The thread-related functions that require CDECL should be declared<br>as such, for precisely this reason --- the calling convention of C++ functions<br>is not specified. If you can list the functions that are causing you problems,<br>we can look into this, and ensure that this problem doesn't occur with the<br>rewrite.<br><br>Anthony<br>-- <br>Anthony Williams<br>Software Developer<br>Just Software Solutions
 Ltd<br>http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>threads-devel mailing list<br>threads-devel@lists.boost.org<br>http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/threads-devel<br></jeffidolh@yahoo.com></blockquote><br><p>&#32;
	
		<hr size=1>Sneak preview the <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40762/*http://www.yahoo.com/preview"> all-new Yahoo.com</a>. It's not radically different. Just radically better.