Boost logo

Boost :

From: Sean A Corfield (sean_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-01 11:20:53

Valentin Bonnard <Bonnard.V_at_[hidden]> wrote:

[> portable extension > anyway in pratice .hpp seems to be widely used and the

Fine. So it should be documented in the header policy

I must say I prefer .C/.H but I accept the case sensitivity argument. My
second preference would be for .cc/.hh but if this is not accepted as default
for every compiler then I could live with .cpp/.hpp (ISTR AIX's compiler
required something unusual but you could force it to eat .C/.H - similarly for
an old Digital compiler).

Whatever we pick, it should be in the header policy. I would also suggest that
the source & header extensions are 'compatible', i.e., one of the following


------------------------------------------------------------------------ home: - Simplifying group communications

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at