[boost] Re: Open Source [QPL] License?

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-02 09:11:27

At 03:43 PM 6/2/99 +0200, Valentin Bonnard wrote:

>Beman Dawes wrote:
>
>> So the current answer is no, Open Source licenses are not normally
>> acceptable.  The sort of terms identified in the copyright notices
in
>> the current libraries are the only restrictions boost.org is
>> currently willing to accept.
>
>But BSD like licenses, w/o the advertising clause, are accepted, 
>aren't they ?

I don't know the terms of the BSD licenses, so would have to see the
specifics.

--Beman

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications