[boost] Re: nonary_function OK?

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-16 09:06:31

At 01:55 PM 6/16/99 +0100, Kevlin Henney wrote:

>Another thought crossed my mind re why we can't use nonary_function
(nun
>jokes aside): if we stuck to the classics inspired  naming
convention, that
>would be the name for a nine place function!

Well, my response to the issue is to go on vacation for the next ten
days.  I expect you will have reduced the issue to null and void by
then.

--Beman

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications