Boost logo

Boost :

From: Szepesvari Csaba (szepes_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-06-16 12:21:05

Dear All,

On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Nicolai Josuttis wrote:

> A related discussion to the compose discussion:
> I have also introduced type nonary_function as supplement for
> unary_function and binary_function for functions that take
> no arguments.
> Question:
> Is the name nonary_function fine or should I use another name
> (e.g. Kevin van Horn uses in his functor extensions
> nullary_functions as far as I know) ?
> Nico

I'm using zeroary_function.


------------------------------------------------------------------------ home: - Simplifying group communications

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at