|
|
Boost : |
From: Sean Corfield (sean.corfield_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-12 04:56:57
On Friday, July 09, 1999 9:31 PM, Valentin Bonnard
[SMTP:Bonnard.V_at_[hidden]] wrote:
> The change considered (in the near future) is that exception
> specifications should be part of the type of function, which
> is currently the case without really being the case.
They're not really part of the type - there is a lot of weasel wording to
make them behave like that in most cases. The committee have not decided
whether to adopt this proposed change so it may well not make it into either
of the TCs, in which case it is hardly the "near future" as we don't start
work on C++0X until 2003!
--
Sean A Corfield fax:+441252654077
Technical Director tel/sms:+44385758805
Object Consultancy Services Ltd http://www.ocsltd.com
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
- Margaret Atwood
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk