|
Boost : |
From: Reid Sweatman (reids_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-13 12:41:47
> > Ah. I hadn't realized we were talking specifically about
> reference-counted
> > objects. I thought it was a statement about the behavior
> of bad_alloc in
> > general that I'd never heard of. Never mind.
>
> Actually bad_alloc has about as much behaviour as int. That
> is to say that it's a value with no behaviour at all.
I think you replied to two different posters' messages here at once, but
I'll just respond to my part. Yes, that's the impression I had of
bad_alloc. It was just sounding like someone was claiming that it had odd
effects on nested DTOR's when thrown.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk