Boost logo

Boost :

From: Reid Sweatman (reids_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-13 12:41:47

> > Ah. I hadn't realized we were talking specifically about
> reference-counted
> > objects. I thought it was a statement about the behavior
> of bad_alloc in
> > general that I'd never heard of. Never mind.
> Actually bad_alloc has about as much behaviour as int. That
> is to say that it's a value with no behaviour at all.

I think you replied to two different posters' messages here at once, but
I'll just respond to my part. Yes, that's the impression I had of
bad_alloc. It was just sounding like someone was claiming that it had odd
effects on nested DTOR's when thrown.

------------------------------------------------------------------------ home: - Simplifying group communications

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at