[boost] Re: config.h[pp]

From: Reid Sweatman (reids_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-14 19:45:10

I'd agree with that.  But it would also be nice if someone (I don't think
I'm up to it, or I'd volunteer) would put together a doc on workarounds for
various compilers.  Since very few people are familiar with all compilers,
maybe whoever wants to can document his favorite compiler, and someone else
act as editor.  Just a suggestion, but it would be a nice addition to that
info library y'all are talking about.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beman Dawes [mailto:beman_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 11:46 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]; boost_at_[hidden]; boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Re: config.h[pp]
> 
> 
> At 07:09 PM 7/14/99 +0200, Dietmar Kuehl wrote:
> 
> > ...
> >
> >I'm still opposed to any requirement that the author should support
> non
> >standard compilers. If someone chooses to support non-standard
> compilers,
> >it might be useful to have a corresponding header file available.
> 
> Yes, agreed.  I will start documenting that viewpoint as the Boost
> policy.
> 
> --Beman
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online. 
> Start with up to 150 Points for joining!
> http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/475
> 
> 
> eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
> http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
> 
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications