Boost logo

Boost :

From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-24 21:59:48


From: Andy Glew <glew_at_[hidden]>
> Before BOOSTing them, I'd like to find a non-intrusive way of doing this.
> I can do it standardly in Borland C++ --- the only C++ manuals I had this weekend.

There is no portable non-intrusive way.

> There may be some sort of pre and post destructor hook.

Not in the standard.

> But I think that this shows a more important issue: there is no portable way
> of wrapperizing functions that do not have hooks planted a priori.

Sure enough.

> I.e. what I want to do is take an arbitrary existing library function foo(),
> write my own library function foo() that intercepts all existing calls to foo(),
> which typically does some work, and then may optionally call the original
> function foo().

That would be quite a trick, although you might could do it at link time on
some systems with the right shenanigans.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk