From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-08-03 20:11:04
At 07:28 PM 8/3/99 +0100, Kevlin Henney wrote:
>Beman Dawes wrote:
>While the template approach seems conceptually more elegant, I find
>the resulting user code unbearably ugly. The typedef and constant
>approach is basically stdint.h without the macros, a nice
> True, but it might be argued that the template approach is in
> consistent w/ the way types are found from templates in the
>Kevlin, what did your template approach look like?
That strikes me as better than having a single type with
exact/least/fast/etc types embedded. Not sure exactly why, but my
gut feeling is it would extend better.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk