[boost] Re: [end of thread] vector helper functions for raw manip ulation (Was: Raw Array Classes)

From: Reid Sweatman (reids_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-09-05 19:52:43

> It's virtually guarantied (will be garantied by the next 
> Technical Corrigendum), and all implementation do it this 
> way, and knowing that it will be garantied no one sane 
> will do it any other way.

Yeah, but I have to use (compiler maker deleted...); you said sane <g>.

> I hope it's done.

Assuming you're right on upcoming specs (and I have no reason to assume
otherwise), yeah, guess it would work.  Thanks for the clarification,
anyway.