From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-11-16 16:08:51
Paul Baxter wrote:
>Further to the recent discussions on the MT and the general random
>class, a couple of points:
>2) The MT itself is free to use, however the code provided
>new simple validation bits and pieces) is LGPL (not GPL as Jeet
>3) We'd need to provide an implementation that is LGPL/GPL free. Is
>code direct from the paper or derived from existing LGPL code?
After 1) reading both Jeet's and the MT C code, and 2) re-reading the
appropriate section of a book on copyrights, I would not want to post
Jeet's code without permission from Makoto Matsumoto and Takuji
I have emailed Makoto-san asking such permission, and also inviting
him to join the discussion here. If the response is favorable, the
problem is solved.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk