[boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ?

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 1999-11-26 16:23:38

That is a good start, but there needs to be support for all the random
access iterator operations as well.

Valentin Bonnard writes:
 > jsiek_at_[hidden] wrote:
 > 
 > > Just realized that I've been using the same principle behind
 > > boost::operators to make the definition of all iterator operations
 > > easier. Would there be an interest for an iterator_ops class?
 > 
 > Already done (except that my code probably isn't working, 
 > like 99% of all the code I write):
 > 
 > http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/bonnard/NewLibs/Utils/iterators_utils.H
 > 
 > -- 
 > 
 > Valentin Bonnard
 > 
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > Accurate impartial advice on everything from laptops to tablesaws. 
 > http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/1701
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > -- 20 megs of disk space in your group's Document Vault
 > -- http://www.egroups.com/docvault/boost/?m=1
 > 
 > 
 >