From: Moore, Paul (Paul.Moore_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-12-13 06:11:45
From: Greg Colvin [mailto:gcolvin_at_[hidden]]
> I don't doubt this is great stuff -- but is enough better
> than Qt to spend time on, or would be be better off leveraging
> that already popular and almost free work?
It's VERY not-free on Windows... And isn't it also Qt that requires you to
preprocess your C++? All that SIGNAL() and SLOT() stuff?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk