From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-12-18 20:38:36
Paul Moore wrote:
> > Several companies (Metrowerks, Intel, at least, probably more)
> > predefine _MSC_VER in an attempt to be compatible. Sigh.
> Grrr. I think I'd blame them. If they define _MSC_VER, they should be
> compatible. Bugs and all. After all, most people only use _MSC_VER as a way of
> protecting bug-workarounds...
I think there's a less obvious reason why they all "have to" define
this. Something like "you can't compile MFC headers otherwise", but I'm
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk