From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-12-19 13:27:40
Paul Moore writes:
> Grrr. I think I'd blame them. If they define _MSC_VER, they should be
> compatible. Bugs and all. After all, most people only use _MSC_VER
> as a way of protecting bug-workarounds...
As Dave surmised, the Microsoft standard library headers are littered
with _MSC_VER conditionals, so you can't compile the headers correctly
without defining _MSC_VER appropriately. And given just how buggy the
compiler is it's hard, and often no favor to the user, to be bug-for-bug
compatible. What you need is to fix as many bugs as you can while still
being able to compile the libraries.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk