From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-12-27 04:10:39
From: Darin Adler <darin_at_[hidden]>
> Something like the void* trick, or a null() or is_null() member function
> would be an improvement. I don't like:
> if (p.get())
> myself. Of course, I have a bigger hang-up about null pointers, as readers
> of this list may already know. I just can't stand the fact that:
> C* x;
> means that x points to an object of class C and you can use all the members
> declared in class C, unless it's 0, in which case you can't use *any* of the
> members declared in class C! It's just a gaping hole in the type system.
It's not that hard to create smart pointers that cannot be null.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk