Date: 2000-01-06 09:47:11
> In the case of Builder 4 it looks as though numeric_limits<T> is
> incorrectly implemented for non-specialisations. . .
Builder bug. Has been reported.
> . . . I haven't been able to figure out all the g++ errors but
> all the remove_cv<T>::type declarations
> need to be prefixed with typename to be strictly correct.
> 2) The is_POD and has_XXX templates look as if they need to
> be implemented
> in terms of is_builtin_integer etc not is_integer<>,
> otherwise user defined
> classes get wrongly classified if numeric_limits is
> specialised for them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk