From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-09 14:24:59
> I'm not sure which concepts you are referring to...
> In the algorithms I used Visitors, which had not yet been discussed
> (well Dietmar said he liked an algorithm object approach
> better). We should probably open discussion about them.
That's the part I was referring to.
> > I neccessarily agree with all of them! Also, what are the status and plans
> > of the part of what you've posted that is in ggcl? Is there some intention
> > to roll it into boost? I'm just trying to understand what we're dealing
> > here...
> This is a bit sticky. The part in ggcl/ will stay with the ggcl
> license. The stuff I've put in the boost directory of that tar ball
> I intend to contribute to boost. Another words, there will be the
> boost graph interface specification, there will be a ggcl
> implementation, and if Dietmar, you, or others want to do a
> boost implementation that's great too. I'm sorry that I can't
> contribute the ggcl implementation, but I can't change the license.
Thanks, that clarifies a lot.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk