From: Kevlin Henney (Kevlin.Henney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-10 05:15:55
>> Small fix: I think the at() method should declare that it is throwing
>> an exception.
>We have decided to avoid exception-specifications in boost. They result in
>significant pessimization on most compilers we've tested.
There is also a prior art reason: the at() members in the standard do not
have throw specs, and they set the style example being followed.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk