[boost] Re: nasty design problem

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-01-11 15:30:21

scleary_at_[hidden] writes:
 > You could use a sort of call_traits. . . :)
 > Specialize for your "row" type, and the rest should be automatic -- choosing
 > Vec & by default but passing your row type by value.

This might just work.

 > This wouldn't work for unary functions, though, unless the template
 > arguments were explicitly specified:
 >   template <class T>
 >   void negate(MTL_call_traits<T>::type x);

Right, though most unary functions only read the argument, so
they can be const&.

 > Maybe a bit messy, but it's an automatic solution.  :)
 > 	-Steve

Thanks, I'll give it a try.

Cheers,

Jeremy