Boost logo

Boost :

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-12 20:18:43


> Yeah, perhaps trying to make the generic graph search apply to your
> case is not the right thing to do, and that is OK. For example, you
> can't write every sequential container algorithm using std::transform :)
>
> The graph_search does apply well to standard depth-first,
> breadth-first, and some other common algorithms like dijkstra's and
> prim's.

I don't think I buy that argument. What I want abstracted out is the
best-first (dijkstra) traversal of the graph. That shouldn't be such a tall
order. The real problem is that of getting enough (the right) information
back to the client about what's going on.

-Dave


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk