From: Gabriel Dos Reis (Gabriel.Dos-Reis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-18 22:21:37
"Dave Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]> writes:
| Valentin wrote.
| >> I'm not absolutely sure what the policy ought to be for generic code, though
| >> I lean toward the high-labor, low-intrusiveness approach (option 2).
| > Since there is no such thing a function partial specialization,
| > option 2 is unusable for any kind of generic code.
| Of course. I must have been temporarily insane. Why there is no function
| partial specialization is a mystery to me, but that's beside the point.
Doesn't 'partial ordering' let you achive the same effects as "function
I guess, the right question concerns the technical reason(s) for not
allowing template function overloading.
| > I understand that deserving a name in all namespaces isn't
| > pleasant.
| I think you meant "reserving".
| Ick. It looks like we're stuck with koenig lookup then.
Hmm, could you enlighten me? I'm lost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk