[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is goodnews

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-01-28 23:29:32

Yeah, more concepts! :)

Greg Colvin writes:
 > 
 > As people keep thinking up new kinds of smart pointer, and new
 > ways to implement the ones we have, I am starting to think we
 > need some sort of smart pointer requirements, which would make it
 > easier to code generically without caring what kind of pointer
 > was chosen, and reduce the pressure to parameterize shared_ptr
 > with different kinds of implementation.