Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-29 00:15:28

Next message: jsiek_at_[hidden]: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is goodnews"
Previous message: Greg Colvin: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is goodnews"
In reply to: Borgerding, Mark A.: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is good news"

From: Borgerding, Mark A. <MarkAB_at_[hidden]>
> ...
> 5) made destructor exception safe (BTW, shared_ptr, shared_array need
> this too! )

I don't think so -- they count on other destructors and deallocation
functions not throwing, just as the standard library does.

Next message: jsiek_at_[hidden]: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is goodnews"
Previous message: Greg Colvin: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is goodnews"
In reply to: Borgerding, Mark A.: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is good news"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk