Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-29 15:13:54

Next message: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is good news"
Previous message: Greg Colvin: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is good news"
In reply to: Valentin Bonnard: "[boost] Re: abs and swap -or- overloading vs. specialization."
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "[boost] Re: abs and swap -or- overloading vs. specialization."

From: Valentin Bonnard <Bonnard.V_at_[hidden]>
> It *seems* to be correct ? How could the Standard be wrong,
> since it is the Truth ?

;->

But it is known that, on rare occasions, the Transcribers of
the Truth have introduced Defects.

Next message: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is good news"
Previous message: Greg Colvin: "[boost] Re: new approach to smart ptrs -- no new()s is good news"
In reply to: Valentin Bonnard: "[boost] Re: abs and swap -or- overloading vs. specialization."
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "[boost] Re: abs and swap -or- overloading vs. specialization."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk