From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-30 11:11:52
on 1/30/00 10:55 AM, Aleksey Gurtovoy at alexy_at_[hidden] wrote:
> But anyway - what everybody think about the code we have by now??
> Assuming what almost everyone have written these classes some time
> ago, do you have any comments about this version?
On quick inspection, it looks like you're creating namespace
boost::geometry2d::std when you specialize less.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk