From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-02-02 21:34:01
on 2/2/00 7:28 PM, Aleksey Gurtovoy at alexy_at_[hidden] wrote:
> But anyway, Dave - we need two versions of 'fill' operator, right?
You're right the const version. I wasn't thinking clearly.
Do we also need the non-const version?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk