From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-02-04 13:13:18
> Let's see if we can do better that temp_value or temporary_value for names.
> How about auto_save or auto_restore? Or has auto_ptr given auto_... names
> a bad name:-)
I think auto_restore is a good name.
For what it's worth, the most-used Macintosh application framework,
Metrowerks' PowerPlant, has the same class as the proposed one. It changes
the value and as in our latest proposed version, it takes a reference as the
first constructor parameter and a const reference as the second. Its name is
"PowerPlant::StValueChanger". The St prefix is pretty silly; it is used to
indicate "I expect this will be used for the type of an automatic variable".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk