[boost] Re: yet another utility class

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-02-06 12:03:23

on 2/6/00 11:11 AM, Darin Adler at darin_at_[hidden] wrote:

> More name suggestions:
> 
> assigner
> auto_assigner
> safe_assigner
> 
> value_changer
> value_setter
> auto_value_changer
> auto_value_setter
> 
> auto_changer
> safe_changer

All of these seem to put the emphasis in exactly the place you didn't like
"set_on_exit" doing - the value being changed at the end of the scope.