Boost logo

Boost :

From: (nil)
Date: 2000-02-07 08:26:53

> You had me worried there for a minute - but checking the standard I'm
> fairly sure that if a type is a POD then the default constructor is
> trivial:
> ...
> Those definitions are actually pretty tight, I don't see how any
> type can fail to have a trivial default constructor given those rules -
> you have a specific case in mind?

No, you're right, John. POD classes do have to have trivial default


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at