Date: 2000-02-07 08:26:53
> You had me worried there for a minute - but checking the standard I'm
> fairly sure that if a type is a POD then the default constructor is
> Those definitions are actually pretty tight, I don't see how any
> type can fail to have a trivial default constructor given those rules -
> you have a specific case in mind?
No, you're right, John. POD classes do have to have trivial default
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk