Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-02-07 13:36:07

Next message: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: yet another utility class"
Previous message: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
In reply to: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
Next in thread: Miki Jovanovic: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
Reply: Miki Jovanovic: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
Reply: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"

I still think linked_ptr::release is a dangerous invitation
to dangling pointers.

Next message: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: yet another utility class"
Previous message: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
In reply to: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
Next in thread: Miki Jovanovic: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
Reply: Miki Jovanovic: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"
Reply: Mark Borgerding: "[boost] Re: change to linked_ptr release"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk