[boost] Re: ABC similar to noncopyable

From: Miki Jovanovic (miki_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-02-23 14:11:13

"mark borgerding" <mborgerdin-_at_[hidden]> wrote: 
> I place a great deal of importance on a name.  The name
> of a class is the first clue that a user has to its function.  I
assume
> that "abc" is just a placeholder, is there another name you had
thought
> of?  The name "abstract" jumps to mind, but it is not entirely
> descriptive, since as soon as it is derived, the condition is met.
>  I am assuming something like this would be the definition.
>      class abstract {  virtual ~abstract() =0 {}  };

Oh, sorry I thought it was obvious:

ABC = Abstract Base Class

Cheers,

Miki Jovanovic.