From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-02 21:40:33
At 04:30 PM 3/1/00 -0500, Andrew D Jewell wrote:
>For those who care, a revised version of RunVector can be found at
>Is this the sort of thing that would belong in boost?
My initial reaction is that the range of applications for RunVector
is a bit too narrow to attract a lot of interest from boost members.
On the other hand, there isn't any hard-and-fast rule that says we
won't post something just because it is narrowly focused. Let's see
it interests other boost members enough to work out technical issues
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk