[boost] Re: ClonePtr and CopyPtr take 2

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-08 21:35:05

on 3/8/00 8:26 AM, Beman Dawes at beman_at_[hidden] wrote:

> In other words, it would be complete (although not necessarily
> desirable) to have:
> 
> deep_opaque_ptr    // also known as CopyPtr
> deep_ptr
> shared_opaque_ptr
> shared_ptr         // same as current
> scoped_opaque_ptr
> scoped_ptr         // same as current

I don't think that the opacity distinction requires a separate class, if the
class template is parceled appropriately into source and header files.

-Dave