Boost logo

Boost :

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-08 21:35:05

on 3/8/00 8:26 AM, Beman Dawes at beman_at_[hidden] wrote:

> In other words, it would be complete (although not necessarily
> desirable) to have:
> deep_opaque_ptr // also known as CopyPtr
> deep_ptr
> shared_opaque_ptr
> shared_ptr // same as current
> scoped_opaque_ptr
> scoped_ptr // same as current

I don't think that the opacity distinction requires a separate class, if the
class template is parceled appropriately into source and header files.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at