[boost] Re: implicit smart pointer conversions

From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-18 02:56:44

In message <001e01bf90a2$3c8da240$37781990_at_[hidden]>, Greg Colvin
<gcolvin_at_[hidden]> writes
[...]
>A compromise might be to have the conditional chose between T* and
>void* conversions, rather than T* and no conversion like we have now.

Agreed, a choice of T * and const void * seems the best choice as it
builds on the current compromise/choice.
____________________________________________________________

  Kevlin Henney                       Curbralan Ltd
  kevlin_at_[hidden]                [phone]
____________________________________________________________