Boost logo

Boost :

From: Valentin Bonnard (Bonnard.V_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-20 11:39:38

Don Waugaman wrote:

> I can see where this would be true in the general case of exception
> specifications, but isn't a throw() specification on a trival function
> an (ahem) exception to the rule?

If the functin is trivial, writing throw() is also a complete
waste of time: the compiler already knows it.

On some compilers, it's a pessimisation is all cases.

I don't see any reasons to write throw-spec on trivial
functions if we don't do it generally for all functions.

Valentin Bonnard

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at