From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-21 12:55:57
From: Gavin Collings <gcollings_at_[hidden]>
> "greg colvin" <gcolvi-_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/boost/?start=2639
> > The library group was rather surprised when the core group
> > informed us that the language would not generate default
> > versions from member template versions.
> So was I. I suppose it might help sort out ambiguity in the case where
> multiple member template constructors could potentially generate a copy
> constructor, but that doesn't seem insurmountable - just use the normal
> template function selection rules and take the most specialized. All I
> could find in D+E and C++ PL was the comment "Curiously enough, a
> template constructor is never used to generate a copy constructor".
> What was the rationale behind this?
I don't remember. I think it was just too late to fix it when we
realized it was true.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk