[boost] Re: auto_ptr "generic ancestor" idea

From: Kevin Atkinson (kevinatk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-28 04:06:18

On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Ian Bruntlett wrote:

> So I hit on the idea that auto_resource<> shouldn't implement its destructor
> at all - the user implements the destructor.
> 
> I'd like to ask a few questions:
> 1. Has this been done already?
> 2. Is it feasable?

Well how the heck do you manage to pull that off withot pasing in a
function class, function, or something like that.

> 3. For a library implementor, is it sensible to implement auto_ptr<> in
> terms of auto_resource<> ?
> 
> TIA
> 
> 
> Ian Bruntlett
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You have a voice mail message waiting for you at iHello.com:
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2377/2/_/9351/_/954231746/
> 
> -- Check out your group's private Chat room
> -- http://www.egroups.com/ChatPage?listName=boost&m=1
> 
> 

Kevin Atkinson
kevinatk_at_[hidden]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/