[boost] Re: auto_ptr "generic ancestor" idea - template specialisation of operator~

From: Kevin Atkinson (kevinatk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-29 00:37:21

On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> 
> > on 3/28/00 5:17 AM, Ian Bruntlett at Ian.Bruntlett_at_[hidden] wrote:
> > 
> > > Can someone help with template specialisation of operator~()
> > > Source code is at the bottom of the message.
> > 
> > Just what exactly do you expect this to do? operator~() has nothing to do
> > with destruction: it's the unary operator which is used to invert the bits
> > of integral types. Am I missing something?
> 
> I think he is confusing operator~ with the destructor.  The destructor is
> ~ClassName not ClassName::operator~.

Im sorry thats ClassName::~ClassName not ClassName::operator~

---
Kevin Atkinson
kevinatk_at_[hidden]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/